Commercial Building Energy Efficiency Retrofits: $190 Billion Market

How big is the market for energy-efficient retrofits of commercial buildings? In a word: Immense. In numbers: Tens of billions of dollars, as we've quantified in previous SmartEnergyWorks posts. As ambitious and bullish as we are at Octus about the market -- and our opportunity to build an extraordinary business -- the Urban Land Institute just upped the stakes.

According to ULI, and as reported in SustainableBusiness.com, the market potential for energy efficiency retrofits in commercial real estate is projected to total $190 billion over the next ten years. From the article:

... the sheer size of the commercial real estate sector's carbon footprint illustrates the potential of energy-efficiency measures to make a dramatic impact on reducing emissions. The nation's approximately five million commercial buildings are responsible for 18% of total annual energy consumption in the U.S.; moreover, only 7% of those buildings represent half of the overall floor area of commercial buildings.

Investing in energy efficiency in real estate--an emerging practice with great market potential--requires new business practices and government incentives to overcome investment barriers. "Recent efforts to catalyze investments in energy efficiency in buildings have challenged how policy makers and market participants view real estate finance and valuation practices," the report says.

"Are investments in energy efficiency to be approached as a discreet value capable of being financed independently of the underlying real estate asset, and then traded as "efficiency-backed" securities on secondary markets? Or, is an energy efficiency investment to be treated in the same way a lobby upgrade is, which without question drives new value to the real estate asset? The answer is both, as policymakers work to unleash market forces to reduce energy demand."

The reports states that innovation in this emerging investment market requires evidence of real costs and returns. Information now available on building performance indicates that feasible energy retrofits for an individual building typically save 20% to 30% and in some cases as much as 60% of energy use, depending on a building's age, type, design, condition and maintenance.

As we discussed a few weeks ago, several energy efficiency project financing vehicles (including the Octus-Five Star Bank Building Energy Savings program; click here for a recent Business Journal article) are emerging. Coupled with increasing incentives and rebates from utility companies, the market is ripe, albeit with barriers. The ULI report echoes our thinking: there is a strong business case for commercial real estate owners and managers to incorporate energy efficient practices in their business strategies:

• Operating-cost reductions through energy savings in an era of tighter budgets
• The creation of reputational advantage in the context of evolving voluntary and regulatory emissions reductions targets
• The creation of new markets or lines of service leading to economic expansion
• Improved tenant working environments, leading to employee retention and higher productivity
• Lower building vacancy rates and tenant turnover
• Reduced business risk in the midst of energy price volatility and changes in consumer preferences regarding green building
• Reduced reputational risk in a globalized, increasingly transparent marketplace.

As SustainableBusiness summarizes, the report cites the need for a change in the perception of energy efficiency as an "investment in less," as in less environmental impact, to an "investment in more," or an investment that produces more value and cost-saving.

We could not agree more.

Commercial Building Energy Use: Start Your Disclosures

If you are a CRE professional in California, section 25402.10 of the California Public Resources Code is probably the last thing on your mind. If you lease, sell or finance commercial properties, come January 1, 2011, it will be top of mind. Specifically, the state will require disclosure of energy ratings and building performance. From the statute: An owner or operator of a nonresidential building shall disclose the [EPA's] Energy Star Portfolio Manager benchmarking data and ratings for the most recent twelve-month period to a prospective buyer, lessee of the entire building, or lender that would finance the entire building.

Last spring the California Energy Commission published a proposed schedule, which after January 1 will require disclosure for any nonresidential building that is solely occupied by the owner or that measures more than 50,000 square feet. Any nonresidential buildings that measure 10,000 to 50,000 square feet will be required to comply as of January 1, 2012, and those as small as 1,000 square feet must be compliant by July 1, 2012.

Analogous -- but obviously, with more depth and variables -- to automobile fuel efficiency stickers, as discussed below. For Octus Energy and other companies involved in generating energy savings and financing energy projects, it will further validate and quantify the value of a building's operating and energy efficiency.

Here's an in-depth look from California Lawyer:

A building's energy score must be accurately calculated, either on the EPA's Portfolio Manager website (www.energystar.gov) by a knowledgeable building owner, or by a third-party energy firm. Although the EPA provides helpful resources on its website (see the Tools and Resources tab), this can be complicated stuff. And because an inaccurate disclosure could create liability, some owners will opt to spend a modest amount of money for professional help.

The required disclosures can also create legal issues regarding tenants' privacy rights. A building owner or an energy disclosure professional is responsible for entering data regarding the tenants' energy consumption over the previous twelve months, along with building parameters such as hours of operation, computer usage, and thermal settings. For the landlord of a triple net leased building, this entails disclosing the tenant's energy bill, which raises potential confidentiality issues. At a minimum, counsel should be writing leases that specifically allow for this statutory disclosure; however, in the absence of a specially tailored clause, seek the tenants' cooperation in attempt to comply with the law.

Limitations of the EPA's online Portfolio Manager may prove problematic for some commercial buildings. For example, though office buildings can be rated quite easily, other facilities such as movie theaters, bowling alleys, and funeral homes are not specifically addressed by the free online software.

Despite imperfections, California's energy disclosure law is an important step forward. Commercial tenants, buyers, and lenders in this state will soon be comparing buildings based on their energy efficiency and, it is hoped, the market will reward more–energy efficient buildings.

So what should attorneys suggest to their clients who own buildings? They should first see if the online compliance resources will suit their purposes. If a more searching analysis is required, the clients can consider having their buildings surveyed by an energy engineer to understand their energy spending and how to reduce it. Indeed, some owners may wish to be more aggressive in the "green market," opting for a full-blown energy audit to identify ways to make a building more efficient.

Energy disclosures do more than comply with legal rules. They also can contribute to a smarter real estate market, just as the fuel efficiency stickers on new cars help educate consumers. And studying a building's energy use may lead to less consumption, higher net operating profits, and a healthier planet.

Well said. To learn more about EPA's Energy Star Portfolio Manager tool, click here.

Green premium? Not so, as it continues to pay to go green with commercial buildings

There's a lot of greenwash in the commercial real estate industry, fostered by pundits and proponents alike. Separating fact from fiction and reality from distortion is a challenge. Except, of course, when it comes to the facts.

Take a recent report from CoStar and the U.S. Green Building Council (USGBC): Green Premium Continues to Justify Implementation Costs for Building Owners. This one's good, and it's real.

A few snippets:

• The economic payback for building owners from 'going green' has been tested in the crucible of the worst economy since the Great Depression, and while the premiums in rental rates, faster lease-up times and lower vacancy associated with green buildings varies market to market, the corresponding increases in rental income, together with the resulting energy savings in operating the property, continue to justify the modest additional costs associated with going green in most markets.
• For tenants, a growing body of research continues to show that buildings with better air quality, natural lighting and variable temperature control yield greater productivity by employees. Also, separate metering and individual utility billing of tenants for their energy use encourages conservation and additional cost savings.
• One big change, however, has been the market shift in LEED certifications from new development. Today, much of the USGBC's certification activity has shifted to LEED for Existing Buildings (LEED-EB), which has seen certifications jump sharply from less than 15% of all certifications in early 2008 to more than 35% in second-quarter 2010.
• Class A LEED office buildings that completed construction before the recession hold a significant advantage over the national average for all Class A office buildings, with the LEED buildings averaging $28.50 per square foot in rent with an average vacancy rate of 6.5%, compared with $25.89 per square foot in average rent and an average vacancy of 10.7% for all Class A office stock.

Green is, well, green. At Octus Energy, we're acutely focused on the economic virtues of improving the operating efficiency of commercial buildings -- slash utility bills first which then drives building certifications (e.g., LEED and Energy Star).

"We do find that it does continue to pay to go green," CoStar Vice President of Analytics Norm Miller said. "In the long run buildings that do not include sustainable features run the very real risk of becoming obsolete. And it will likely be very risky to own buildings that do not have sustainable features in the future."

"We also know that tenants in green buildings enjoy higher levels of productivity and see a real benefit and value to having their employees in green buildings. Because there are still so few green buildings out there many tenants haven't experienced that impact yet. But we believe this will change in time as those markets become more educated and tenants begin to pursue the productivity benefits of green buildings," Miller said. "We expect rental premiums or energy savings to more than justify the added costs for energy saving green features like separate meters, motion detection light devices, or water savings devices."

Energy Efficiency Tax Deductions: Hidden Gem for Commercial Properties?

Retrofitting commercial properties with energy-efficient equipment -- lighting, HVAC and energy management controls -- is a fairly straight-forward process. Equipment is upgraded, buoyed by utility company incentives and rebates. The reduced energy costs more than cover the cost of building improvements. And, as the building operates more efficiently, net operating incomes and asset values are bolstered. In short, reducing energy use is both the least expensive form of energy and one of the most lucrative investments a property owner can make.

Can it get better? Project financing -- oftentimes with no out-of-pocket costs for property owners; click here for information about Octus's program and other emerging solutions -- is catalytic, perhaps a game-changer. And, energy tax deductions are frosting on an already tasty cake. If your company builds, owns or leases commercial buildings, and you have installed or retrofitted the property to be more energy efficient, you may be eligible to deduct all or part of the costs associated with the installation or retrofit. Here's a summary from SourceCorp:

The EPAct §179D Tax Deduction provides a tax deduction of up to $1.80 per square foot for the installation of systems that reduce the total energy and power costs by 50 percent. Eligible building systems include interior lighting systems, heating, cooling, ventilation, hot water systems and building envelope systems.

To qualify for a full or partial deduction, the energy-efficient building property must meet the following criteria. The building:

• must have been placed in service after December 31, 2005.
• must be located in the United States.
• installation made is part of interior lighting systems, HVAC and hot water systems or the building envelope (insulation, exterior doors, exterior windows, roofing material).
• has been certified that installation will reduce total annual energy and power costs by 50 percent or more as compared to a reference building.
• energy and power consumption calculations are based on IRS-approved software programs that compare the subject facility to an ASHRAE Reference Building.
• must be certified by an IRS-qualified professional engineer or contractor licensed in the same jurisdiction as the proposed building.

"The most often overlooked tax benefit relative to the Energy Policy Act extension is the tax benefits construed for commercial building owners," said Julio Gonzalez, chief executive officer of Engineered Tax Services. "Real estate investors can now reduce the payback period in investing in energy-efficient components with the added benefit of deducting up to the entire expense of these assets immediately, versus depreciating these assets over 39 years. The Energy Policy Act of 2005 includes a tax deduction for investments in energy-efficient commercial building property designed to significantly reduce the heating, cooling, water heating, and interior lighting energy costs."

According to Gonzalez, Congress extended the energy tax benefits through 2013, and it may increase them from $1.80 per square foot to $3 per square foot later this year. A partial deduction of $0.60 per square foot is available for investments that reduce energy costs by 16 2/3% in one of three systems—lighting, heating and cooling, or building envelope.

Importantly, this is a tax deduction, and not a tax credit -- a tax credit is a dollar-for-dollar credit against your tax obligation, whereas a deduction reduces your gross income, and, therefore, will save you taxes as a percentage of the tax obligation.

++++

Post-script (29 Sept. 10): Thorough, blow-by-blow recap of 179D tax deductions in an article authored by Engineered Tax Services: Are Millions of Dollars Hiding in Your Buildings? Read on. It's real, viable and lucrative for CRE owners, managers, tenants and service providers to pursue and provision energy-efficiency upgrades.

BOMA San Francisco Launches Commercial Property Energy Efficiency Program

A preponderance of activity and attention in the energy efficiency industry focuses on tangible, physical improvements to buildings and their equipment. Rightly so, given the energy savings and returns generated through the implementation of lighting, HVAC and energy management technologies. But, such activities are only part (albeit a primary piece) of the energy efficiency puzzle -- there's much to be learned, and many dollars to be saved, through thoughtful behavioral and operational practices.

Last month, the Building Owners and Managers Association (BOMA) of San Francisco announced they will coordinate delivery throughout California of the BOMA Energy Efficiency Program (BEEP), an innovative series that teaches commercial real estate professionals how to reduce energy consumption -- and related costs -- with proven, no- and low- cost strategies for optimizing equipment, people and practices. From BOMA's press release:

Nationwide, the commercial real estate industry spends approximately $24 billion annually on energy. Yet energy consumption represents the single, largest controllable operating expense for office buildings. BOMA anticipates BEEP will reduce energy consumption by as much as 30 percent in participating commercial properties

"If 2,000 Bay Area buildings adopt BEEP's best practices during the next three years, the resulting savings gained from reduced energy consumption will amount to $400 million," said BOMA SF Executive Vice President Marc Intermaggio. "The fact is a 30 percent reduction in energy consumption in the nation's commercial buildings, which equates to $7.2 billion, is readily achievable simply by improving building operating standards."

Click here to visit BOMA's BEEP site and learn more.

Why Sustainability is Sustainable for Commercial Real Estate

Great post last week in RealEstateJournals.com engaging how and why sustainable buildings make sense for commercial real estate developers, investors and managers. Here's the initial tease from the post's author, Don Schoenheider, a vice president of Liberty Property Trust (NYSE: LYR), a $6.6 billion REIT:

Fifteen years ago the word “recycling” was something aging hippies did and a “carbon footprint” was what was left if you stepped too close to the fireplace and then walked on a rug. How times change: today both are top of mind for commercial real estate developers, brokers and tenants, and it is crucial to understand the benefits if you want to best serve your company or client.

Schoenheider believes -- and we concur -- commercial real estate development has forever changed on four important levels: building occupancy cost, employee productivity, customer relations and commitment to the future of business.

1. Occupancy cost. Sustainable buildings are first and foremost about efficiency – saving energy, saving water and keeping reusable materials out of landfills. Liberty has consistently demonstrated they can provide tenants with a commitment to a sustainable environment and save them money; at least $.15-$.30 cents – or more – a square foot in occupancy costs. Lower electric bills, lower water bills, lower gas bills … something they can easily (and happily) relate to.
2. Healthier buildings. Sustainable buildings tend to be healthier, meaning less time is lost to illness which translates into greater productivity and lowered employee turn-over.
3. Customer relations. Investors see the cost savings, employees see the health benefits, vendors see the opportunity to work with a progressive company and customers are actively looking for a commitment to the environment.
   
4. Sustainability: The future of business. Who will be the commercial real estate decision makers in just 10 or 15 years? Schoenheider posits. People who have grown up recycling, tracking that carbon footprint (and I don’t mean across the carpet), installing solar panels in their homes and driving hybrid cars. How will they view non-sustainable buildings? Just like disco (and grunge and ponchos and Ugg boots and …): obsolete.

Schoenheider wraps with a reflection of the past decade: We at Liberty remember saying in 2002 that a sustainable building was only expected to cost 10-20% more to develop than a standard building. Today as we approach break-even, the goal is to make them even less expensive to develop than standard buildings.

Companies like Liberty get it. The qualitative virtues of sustainable buildings are somewhat difficult to grasp; they're there, but they are intangible. However, there's no argument with the quantitative benefits. When you invest in making your real estate assets more efficient and sustainable, your NOI increases, asset values are bolstered, occupancy rates rise, and you can command higher lease rates. It's a sustainable path to the bank.

$50 billion reasons energy efficiency works

The growth of energy efficiency has been hamstrung by its relative transparency, its invisible nature. Is it real? Does it work? A recent GreenerBuildings post authored by Evan Smith, Kickstarting the Green Economy with Building Energy Efficiency, lends credence -- $50 billion worth -- to the immediate and perpetual efficacy of energy efficiency.

Quick synopsis:

What isn't getting enough play in our green technology economy is work we can and need to undertake right away: A serious coordinated effort to deploy network-based portfolio-management energy efficiency strategies and measures across our buildings and fleet transportation systems as rapidly as possible.

Here's one specific area for consideration. United States commercial real estate (all buildings except residential housing and goods-producing industries like manufacturing, agriculture and construction) consumes energy at a substantial and growing rate. It will grow at two-thirds the rate of gross domestic product through 2025, according to the Annual Energy Outlook 2005 published by the U.S. Energy Information Agency. In 2003, the commercial building sector, which is made up of 4.9 million commercial buildings covering more than 71.6 billion square feet of floor space, consumed 17,548 trillion BTUs of energy. Estimating a conservative nominal energy cost of $10 per MMBTU, the energy bill for commercial buildings in the U.S. exceeds $175 billion annually.

What is absolutely criminal is that today, somewhere between 20 percent and 40 percent of that energy is wasted, even from buildings built within the last 10 years.

The translation of energy waste to money lost -- seemingly simple, certainly proven -- is a cognitive challenge. Utility rates go up. Buildings age and become increasingly inefficient. Property owners and managers pay their utility bill every month. They can't see the energy they're wasting, and the hole in their pocket expands. It's groundhogs' day, and hole gets deeper with each setting of the sun.

Simply stated:

Start with the $175 billion in annual energy costs for the U.S. commercial real estate. Conservatively, 30 percent is available to conserve. The savings potential therefore approximates $50 billion annually.

What to do? The article frames a common scenario for facility owners and managers, and proffers a sage suggestion amplifying the purpose and utility of Octus's Smart Energy Platform:

In most facilities, maintenance staff work on the most egregious failures when they detect them, but the reality is that maintenance only detects and addresses some fraction of failures. The energy performance of most buildings today, even new ones, relying on alert maintenance staff and manual controls, is well below optimal.

New approaches to smart building facilities portfolio management enables digital readouts on zones, nodes and systems within wired buildings that can tell maintenance the energy (and air quality, safety, carbon footprint, etc.) impact of each failure on a real-time basis. These readouts - like giving each building an MRI every 15 minutes - can help maintenance staff to rapidly staunch energy losses and conserve most of the energy loss potential identified. These technologies and approaches are available now.

Energy Efficiency and Real Estate: Opportunities for Investors (take two)

In a post last week, we summarized a Mercer and Ceres report, Energy efficiency and real estate: Opportunities for investors. The report equips real estate investors and property managers with a pragmatic framework, and anecdotal evidence, to make informed decisions about how to implement energy-efficiency initiatives, with a central theme: If you’re not investing in energy efficiency, you are leaving money on the table. Corroborating music to our ears.

The report concludes with eight terse and meaningful morsels:

• Energy efficient buildings offer a measurable financial benefit over non-green buildings, in the form of higher rent, occupancy, valuation and lower operating costs
• No- or low-cost energy efficiency improvements can have quick and dramatic impacts on property operating costs
• Poorly performing buildings represent an opportunity for a significant investment gain when it comes to energy efficiency
• Additional improvements require planning, partnerships and initial investments, but can also decrease operating expenses and raise resale and leasing value
• Investment managers and products that consider energy efficiency and green building practices are increasingly available to investors
• Barriers to implementing energy efficiency improvements are eroding as demand grows, research on the benefits continues, and supporting products and services improve feasibility and cost-effectiveness
• A growing number of strong networks, initiatives and tools are helping investors, owners and property managers measure and improve energy performance and prioritize new projects and programs
• All of the above factors facilitate indirect approaches to energy efficiency improvements, which provide further opportunities to investors

As Energy Efficiency Booms, Buildings Get a Brain

The Cleantech Group recently released a comprehensive analysis of energy efficiency innovations in commercial office buildings. The findings are promising -- and lucrative -- for commercial building owners, managers and developers, let alone smart energy investors.

“Commercial office buildings consume 40% of the electricity produced in the U.S. and 18% of total U.S. energy,” said Sheeraz Haji, president of the Cleantech Group. “Our analysis shows that energy efficiency is poised to overtake solar as a top investment category in 2010, and commercial buildings represent a prime target. Lower investment costs, financial incentives, and faster payback periods are fueling product competition as data-driven technologies battle over the building’s brain.”

As we opined in a previous post, commercial, industrial and municipal buildings are dumb, inefficient and, above all, wasteful. If you own or manage a building (or a portfolio of buildings), you are unnecessarily wasting money every day. But, if your building has a brain -- if it's intelligent and you are intelligent in your management of your asset -- you, well, get smart. Andrew DeGuire, vice president, strategy and acquisitions with Johnson Controls, explains:

True building efficiency can only be achieved when executives take a more holistic view of their portfolio of buildings. Robust building control systems can be networked within buildings and across a portfolio to integrate security, lighting and HVAC with other enterprise applications, providing real-time data to track performance, decrease operating costs, and set future efficiency goals.

According to the Cleantech report, the focus on performance is driving an information and communication technologies invasion of buildings to enable greater visibility and control as vendors compete to be the gateway to building intelligence. Data-driven energy efficiency products and services look poised to grow, including low-powered Wi-Fi sensors, energy management software, building automation, and smart lighting and windows.

We could not agree more. A decade ago, few computers and information systems were networked; now, it's commonplace. Today, few buildings (and their energy-consuming equipment, specifically lighting and cooling systems) are networked. Ten years from now, we may look back and chortle at the back-then arcane -- boy, they were dumb! -- and wasteful condition of buildings.

Energy Efficiency and Real Estate: Opportunities for Investors

Commercial real estate developers, owners and managers are not adverse to making money. However, many are tentatively uncertain when it comes to energy efficiency -- implementing energy- and cost-savings measures to improve the performance and increase the value of their assets. Until recently, their trepidation made sense; minimal information and benchmarks existed to validate and propel their energy-efficiency investments. Times are changing.

A recent report authored by Mercer and Ceres -- Energy efficiency and real estate: Opportunities for investors -- elaborates how and why fiduciaries responsible for real estate portfolios assume significant risk and overlook substantial opportunities to enhance returns if they fail to factor energy efficiency into their real estate investment decisions. The seminal report lays out the steps investors can take to improve energy efficiency, and presents best practices for different types of investments.

A few metrics validating the business case for energy efficiency:

• A 2008 McGraw-Hill Construction/US Green Building Council survey found that markets for green commercial and institutional buildings in the US have risen from 2 percent in 2005 ($3 billion) to about 10 to 12 percent of construction value ($24 billion – $29 billion) in 2008, with projected growth to 20 to 25 percent ($56 billion – $70 billion) by 2013.
• Current research by RREEF, Deutsche Bank’s real estate investment division, reveals a shortage of energy efficient real estate to meet this growing demand. Price and value premiums observed for green buildings reflect this shortage of such properties on the market.
• A Maastricht University study found an actual rental premium of 3.5 percent on US office properties, a 6 percent increase in occupancy for ENERGY STAR buildings (similar to McGraw-Hill survey results), and a 16 to 17 percent premium on transaction prices (sales price per square foot).
• In a 2008 study, University of Arizona Professor Gary Pivo and Indiana University Professor Jeffrey Fischer found higher income and income growth, lower capitalization rates, higher net operating income per square foot, higher market value, higher rent and lower expenses for ENERGY STAR rated properties, compared to properties with no energy efficiency rating.
• In a 2009 study, researchers at the School of Real Estate and Planning at Henley Business School found commercial building price premiums of 10 percent and 31 percent, respectively, for ENERGY STAR and LEED- certified buildings.

In addition, the report (page 26) sequences -- in plain, make-it-happen language -- technical improvements for energy efficiency upgrades: Retrocommissioning, lighting, supplemental load reductions, air distribution systems, and heating and cooling systems.

Overall, the three most significant drivers for energy-saving retrofits are energy cost reductions, responding to client demand and a desire to create a superior product. Based purely on economic returns, investing in energy efficiency is the single most viable investment a property owner or manager can make.